QIN K25 Smartphone: 3.54-inch touch screen
Available Options

Meet the QIN K25—a little powerhouse of a smartphone that's got global appeal. It packs a 3.54-inch touch screen (that's 640*960 resolution, by the way) serving up visuals so crisp, you'll wanna reach out and touch 'em. And with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, this thing doesn't just jog; it sprints, leaving plenty of room for all your apps and cat videos. Staying connected? Piece of cake, thanks to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. It's running Android 14, so you're all set with the freshest features and security that doesn't sleep. Oh, and it's dressed in sleek black—because who says tech can't have a little style?
- 4GB RAM
- 128GB storage
- Wi-Fi connectivity
- Bluetooth support
- Android 14 OS
- 3.54-inch touch screen
General specs
- Brand: QIN
- Model: K25
- Seller: Joom
- Screen Size: 3.54 inches
- Resolution: 640*960
- RAM: 4GB
- Storage: 128GB
- Operating System: Android 14
- Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
- First listed by seller: 8/1/25
If you are interested in more details, you can find full information on the seller's page.
Shipping options
Comparison with similar products
This item | Recommendations | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() QIN K25 3.54-inch touch screen
|
![]() QIN F22 Touchscreen display
|
![]() QIN F22 Pro 4G Helio G85 octa-core CPU
|
![]() QIN F21 Pro MTK6761 quad core cortex-A53 up to 2.0GHz CPU
|
![]() QIN F21 Pro MTK6761 quad core cortex-A53 up to 2.0GHz CPU
|
![]() POCO M5 128GB Storage
|
|
Brand | QIN | QIN | QIN | QIN | QIN | POCO |
Model | K25 | F22 | F22 Pro 4G | F21 Pro | F21 Pro | M5 |
Color | ||||||
Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price | $136.13 | $95.73 | $135.18 | $90.48 | $111.18 | $226.72 |
Seller | Joom | Joom | Sunsky | Sunsky | Sunsky | Gshopper |
Update | August 31, 2025 | August 8, 2025 | July 3, 2025 | July 9, 2025 | July 3, 2025 | July 25, 2024 |
Operating System | Android 14 | Android 11 | Android 12 | |||
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | 4G Volte, GPS, WiFi hotspot, Infrared remote control | NFC | ||
Display | 2.8-inch, 480*640 resolution | 2.8 inch, 640 x 480px, IPS capacitive touch screen | 2.8 inch, 640 x 480px, IPS capacitive touch screen | 6.58", 90Hz Refresh Rate | ||
Memory | 3GB RAM, 32GB storage | 3GB RAM, 32GB storage | 4GB RAM, 64GB storage | |||
Battery | 1700 mAh | 2150mAh | 2150mAh | 5000mAh | ||
Camera | No camera | 5MP AF rear, 2MP front | 50MP | |||
CPU | Helio G85 octa-core | MTK6761 quad core cortex-A53 up to 2.0GHz | MTK6761 quad core cortex-A53 up to 2.0GHz | |||
Network | 4G, 3G, 2G | 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz, 3G: WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100MHz, 4G: FDD-LTE B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B17/B20/B28A, TDD-LTE B34/B38/B39/B40/B41 | 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz, 3G: WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100MHz, 4G: FDD-LTE B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B17/B20/B28A, TDD-LTE B34/B38/B39/B40/B41 |
Edward M.
Edinburgh
August 11, 2025
I was expecting a solid device based on the brand's reputation, and in reality, it mostly delivered. As it seemed to me, the very crisp display and smooth operation met my needs for work and personal use, handling my apps and videos without a hitch. The connectivity is reliable, and I appreciate the up-to-date software that keeps things running securely. However, the smaller screen took some getting used to, especially when multitasking or watching content, and while it's fast, it's not the powerhouse I might have hoped for in every scenario. Overall, it's a very capable phone that fits well into my daily routine, balancing performance with practicality, though I do wish for a bit more screen real estate.
- Pros: The screen is incredibly sharp and detailed, making everything look vivid and almost touchable. It handles multiple apps smoothly without any lag, and there's ample space for all my files and media. Staying connected is effortless with wireless and short-range options, and the latest software ensures everything feels fresh and secure. The design is sleek and stylish in black, adding a nice touch to its functionality.
- Cons: The screen size is quite small, which can be a bit limiting for some tasks or media consumption. While it performs well, it might not be the absolute fastest for the most demanding users, and the storage, though generous, could fill up quickly with extensive use over time.