LONDON — The police investigation of London’s latest terrorist attack intensified Monday as politicians officially resumed campaigning ahead of an unpredictable election that will be held in just three days.
Police carried out early-morning raids at addresses in Newham and Barking — both in east London — that they said were connected to Saturday night’s London Bridge attack, which killed seven people and injured dozens more, including four police officers.
The assailants have not yet been named, but police say they know their identities.
Speaking on the BBC, London Police Chief Cressida Dick said that the majority of recent attacks have had a “domestic center of gravity,” although with some of them, there are “undoubtedly international dimensions.”
Christine Archibald, 30, a Canadian from the western province of British Columbia, was the first victim to be named. The 30-year-old had worked at a homeless shelter in Calgary before moving to Europe to live with her fiance.
“Please honor her by making your community a better place. Volunteer your time and labor or donate to a homeless shelter. Tell them Chrissy sent you,” her family said in a statement.
At a news briefing from the area of the attack, London Mayor Sadiq Khan said he was “furious” that the attackers used Islam as justification for their actions.
“I’m angry and furious that these three men are seeking to justify their actions by using the faith that I belong to,” said Khan, London’s first Muslim mayor. “The ideology they follow is perverse, and it is poisonous.”
On Sunday night, tens of thousands attended an Ariana Grande benefit concert that was originally intended to honor the dead from last month’s suicide bombing at the singer’s concert in Manchester but was expanded to recognize the victims in London.
Following the May 22 attack in Manchester, Saturday night’s van-and-knife rampage was the second mass-casualty attack to intrude on the homestretch of a parliamentary campaign that was once thought certain to end in a landslide for Prime Minister Theresa May and the Conservatives. The race has tightened in recent weeks, and terrorism has introduced an unexpected variable.
Rival party leaders lashed out at one another Monday over whether more police officers or more police powers are needed to combat terrorism.
During a speech in central London, May repeatedly refused to say she regretted cutting police numbers during her time as home secretary. Instead, she said that her Conservative Party had given the police and security services enhanced powers to fight terrorism.
“We’ve given increased powers to be able to deal with terrorists, powers that Jeremy Corbyn has boasted he has always opposed,” she said.
Corbyn, the leader of the opposition Labour party, shot back, telling that the ITV that “we should never have cut the police numbers.”
With her premiership on the line, May took an aggressive and combative tone Sunday, telling the nation that “enough is enough” and insisting that there is “far too much tolerance for extremism in our country.”
“Things need to change,” she said in a speech outside the prime minister’s residence at 10 Downing Street.
She blamed the attack on the “evil ideology of Islamist extremism,” called for a thorough review of the nation’s counterterrorism policies and suggested that she will take a much tougher line if she wins Thursday’s vote.
The speech was criticized by the Labour Party as a thinly veiled jab at their far-left leader, Corbyn, whom May has often accused of coddling anti-Western militants. May, Corbyn’s backers said, had politicized the attack.
But by Sunday evening, Corbyn had hit back with his own political response to the killing, accusing May and her Conservative allies of weakening security services through years of austerity.
“You cannot protect the public on the cheap,” Corbyn said in a speech in the northern English city of Carlisle that ended a brief pause in formal campaigning. “The police and security services must get the resources they need, not 20,000 police cuts.”
Corbyn also derided President Trump, accusing him of lacking both “grace” and “sense” after the U.S. leader twisted a quote from Khan to criticize the West’s most prominent Muslim politician.
May, who has gone to great lengths to cultivate ties with Trump, had earlier defended Khan while carefully avoiding any criticism of the U.S. president.
The multilayered controversy came as investigators were just beginning to unravel details of the assailants and the plot behind the killings that jolted the country Saturday night.
At just after 10 p.m., three men plowed a rented Renault van into a crowd of pedestrians on London Bridge, then got out and used knives to slash bar and restaurant patrons at the nearby Borough Market.
The attackers were fatally shot by police within eight minutes of the first emergency call, with eight officers firing a total of 50 rounds at men who had donned camouflage and fake suicide vests to carry out the carnage.
Canada’s prime minister and France’s foreign minister confirmed that their nationals were among the dead.
Mark Rowley, assistant commissioner of London’s Metropolitan Police, said in a news conference late Sunday afternoon that investigators were still trying to confirm the identities of the attackers and that they were “increasingly confident” there were no other perpetrators. He said police had “more to do” to determine whether the assailants had help in planning the attack.
Rowley praised the performance of officers who responded to the attack — a view that was echoed almost universally Sunday — and described the number of shots fired as “unprecedented” in a country where most officers do not carry a firearm and those who do rarely, if ever, use it.
The fusillade, Rowley said, was necessary “to be completely confident [officers] had neutralized the threat that those men posed.”
At least 48 people were injured in the attack — including one bystander who was hit by an errant police bullet and is expected to recover. Four officers were among the injured. Rowley said Sunday that 21 of those injured were in critical condition.
As doctors and nurses tended to the wounded, police carried out raids in the East London neighborhood of Barking in a signal that the authorities are looking into the possibility that others may have been involved in the attack.
In Barking, neighbors said police had taken away at least five people early Sunday from a mixed-income 10-story building believed to have been home to one of the attackers. Neighbors said that they heard loud bangs during the raid and that one of the men who was ultimately arrested had tried to flee.
Even as the investigation intensified, authorities did not raise the nation’s threat level, as they had after the bombing in Manchester last month. The decision suggested that authorities do not think another attack is imminent, although under the existing “severe” rating, one is considered highly likely.
Investigators were focused on the likelihood that the attack had been inspired, if not directed, by the Islamic State, which claimed responsibility Sunday (although similar claims in the past have been shown to be unreliable). The militant group has called on its followers to carry out attacks in the West, especially during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
Saturday’s killings follow both the Manchester attack and a March attack that was eerily similar in style to the one that unfolded at and around London Bridge. In March, an attacker rammed pedestrians on a different Thames River crossing and fatally stabbed a police officer at the gates of Parliament.
The three recent attacks were not connected, May said. But she described it as “a new trend” in which terrorists are “copying one another and often using the crudest means of attack.”
May also seemed to acknowledge Sunday that British security services are struggling to keep up as the scale of the threat grows. The services say they have disrupted at least 18 plots in recent years. But they have about 3,000 suspected extremists on watch lists — far too many to actively monitor at all times.
Previous attacks have been carried out by people who had been flagged to the security services for concern but had been judged to be peripheral to any active plots.
Adding to the growing political debate about the attack were Sunday morning tweets by Trump, who took aim at political correctness, the push in the United States for tougher gun laws and Khan. Trump chided the London mayor for attempting to calm the public by assuring that there was “no need to be alarmed.”
Khan’s comments were in reference to an escalated police presence on London streets. But Trump incorrectly implied they were a comment about the attack itself.
Khan’s office released a statement saying the mayor “has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet.”
Trump’s tweets were widely mocked in Britain, where the overwhelming mood was one of unity against terrorism and praise for security services.